Which of the following is NOT a consequence of urban sprawl?

Which of the following is NOT a consequence of urban sprawl?

• A. Increased traffic congestion
• B. Expansion into agricultural land
• C. Better public transportation
• D. Higher infrastructure costs

Answer: (C)

Urban sprawl is characterized by the spreading out of a city and its suburbs over more and more rural land. This phenomenon often leads to several consequences, including increased traffic congestion, as more people living further from the city center rely on cars for transportation. Additionally, urban sprawl typically involves the expansion of urban areas into agricultural land, reducing the available space for farming and potentially impacting food production. Higher infrastructure costs can also arise because the spread-out nature of urban development requires more extensive networks of roads, utilities, and services, which can be costly to maintain. In contrast, better public transportation is typically not a direct consequence of urban sprawl. In sprawling cities, public transportation systems may actually struggle to keep pace with the demand, leading to reduced efficiency and accessibility. Instead, people often resort to relying on personal vehicles, contributing further to congestion and other issues associated with urban sprawl. Thus, the assertion that better public transportation is a consequence of urban sprawl does not align with the typical outcomes of this phenomenon.

Urban sprawl is characterized by the spreading out of a city and its suburbs over more and more rural land. This phenomenon often leads to several consequences, including increased traffic congestion, as more people living further from the city center rely on cars for transportation. Additionally, urban sprawl typically involves the expansion of urban areas into agricultural land, reducing the available space for farming and potentially impacting food production. Higher infrastructure costs can also arise because the spread-out nature of urban development requires more extensive networks of roads, utilities, and services, which can be costly to maintain.

In contrast, better public transportation is typically not a direct consequence of urban sprawl. In sprawling cities, public transportation systems may actually struggle to keep pace with the demand, leading to reduced efficiency and accessibility. Instead, people often resort to relying on personal vehicles, contributing further to congestion and other issues associated with urban sprawl. Thus, the assertion that better public transportation is a consequence of urban sprawl does not align with the typical outcomes of this phenomenon.